diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/kernel/1007')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/kernel/1007 | 28 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/kernel/1007 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/kernel/1007 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c20966ac4 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/kernel/1007 @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "qemu-user: add execveat syscall support". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +First, I'll break down the bug report. It's about adding support for the execveat syscall in qemu-user. QEMU is an emulator and a virtualization tool that can run different operating systems under other environments. + +The term "syscall" usually refers to system calls, which are functions provided by the operating system kernel. So this seems related to how the user-mode QEMU handles system calls when running guest programs. + +Looking at the categories: + +- Mistranslation: This is about incorrect mapping from source architecture to target or IR. It's more of a translation issue rather than adding new features. +- Assembly: Lowering assembly code, but here it's about adding a syscall, not about assembly lowering. +- Device: Not directly related unless execveat interacts with devices, which I don't think is the case. +- Graphic: Unrelated to graphics. +- Socket/network: Maybe if execveat deals with sockets or network calls, but in this context, it's about the syscall itself. +- KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine. Adding a syscall support doesn't directly relate to KVM unless QEMU is integrating more tightly with the hypervisor, which isn't indicated here. +- Boot: Not related to booting processes. +- VNC: Unrelated. +- Debug: Probably not related to debugging features. +- Files/permissions: Possibly, but again, it's about syscall support. +- Performance: Could be, but adding a feature isn't necessarily about performance optimization. +- Kernel: This seems relevant because execveat is a system call that interacts with the kernel. QEMU might need to handle this in its emulation of user-mode processes. +- Peripherals: Not directly unless it's hardware-related, which it's not. +- Hypervisor: KVM is a hypervisor, but adding syscall support is more about the guest OS interaction rather than hypervisior functions. + +So, considering all categories, "kernel" seems to be the most appropriate because it relates to how QEMU handles system calls that interact with the underlying operating system's kernel. +</think> + +kernel \ No newline at end of file |