diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/1455475')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/1455475 | 29 |
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/1455475 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/1455475 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1835df9d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/1455475 @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is having an issue with QEMU when trying to commit a snapshot. They provided details about the error message and some commands they ran. + +First, looking at the error message: "error: internal error: unable to execute QEMU command 'block-commit': Device 'drive-virtio-disk0' is busy: block device is in use by block job: commit." This suggests that there's a problem with a block device being used during a commit operation. + +They tried using `virsh` commands like `blockcommit` and `blockjob`, but after the commit, they couldn't find an active job. However, this issue didn't occur when they tested with QEMU 2.1, indicating something changed in the newer version causing the problem. + +The possible categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The error is related to block devices and QEMU commands, which points towards a block-level issue. Since the problem occurs during a snapshot commit and involves block jobs, it's likely not a translation or assembly issue. It also doesn't seem to be directly related to graphics, sockets, or networking, though network-related commands might involve similar device handling. + +Hypervisor is another category, but this seems more specific to how QEMU manages block devices. The error message mentions the hypervisor (QEMU) command failing because a device is busy. This could relate to how the hypervisor handles disk I/O or scheduling during snapshot operations. + +Looking deeper, the issue arises when using the newer QEMU version, which suggests it's a regression in how block jobs are managed. Since it's about device management and block operations within the hypervisor, 'hypervisor' seems like a fitting category. + +Alternatively, considering that block devices are peripherals, but 'peripherals' might be too broad. The specific mention of block jobs and QEMU commands leans more towards the hypervisor's handling of these operations. + +So, after evaluating, the bug is most likely related to how the hypervisor (QEMU) manages block device operations during a snapshot commit. +</think> + +The issue described is related to how the hypervisor handles block devices during a snapshot commit operation. Specifically, it involves QEMU commands failing due to a block device being in use by another job, which doesn't occur with an older version of QEMU. This points to a regression in the management of block jobs within the hypervisor. + +**Answer:** + +The appropriate classification for this bug is: + +**Hypervisor** + +This category captures issues related to how the hypervisor (QEMU) manages virtual devices and operations, such as block device handling during snapshot commits. \ No newline at end of file |