summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/1724
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/1724')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/172429
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/1724 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/1724
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a2fe62695
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/1724
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report about QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's start by reading the problem description carefully.
+
+The user reports that when using `qemu-system-riscv64` with certain configurations, GDB can't break into the running program. They mention that older versions (like 7.2) don't have this issue, so it's something that changed in newer QEMU versions.
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce:
+- The user sets up a RISC-V environment using QEMU with specific options.
+- They start GDB and connect to the remote target on port 26000.
+- When they try to continue execution (`c`), GDB can't stop the target, leading to an error message about the target not responding to interrupt requests.
+
+The additional information points to a commit from QEMU's master branch, which might have introduced the bug.
+
+Now, considering the categories:
+- The issue is related to debugging with GDB. Specifically, the problem arises when trying to control the execution using GDB, so it's likely tied to how QEMU handles debug-related operations.
+- There are categories like "debug," "vnc," "network," etc., but "debug" seems the most fitting here since the problem is about gdb integration and interrupt handling.
+
+Other possible categories might be "device" if it's a hardware emulation issue or "network" if the GDB connection fails, but in this case, the failure occurs after connecting. The main problem is that QEMU isn't responding to GDB's interrupt requests, which points more towards a debugging mechanism issue rather than network connectivity.
+
+So, the category should be "debug."
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where GDB cannot break into the running program when using `qemu-system-riscv64` with certain configurations. The problem is reproducible in newer QEMU versions but not in older ones (7.2). This suggests that a change introduced in a recent commit has caused the issue.
+
+The key observations are:
+1. The user successfully connects to GDB, indicating no network or connection issues.
+2. When trying to continue execution and then attempt to break, QEMU does not respond to interrupt requests.
+3. The failure occurs after connecting and attempting control via GDB, pointing towards a debugging mechanism issue.
+
+Given these points, the most appropriate category is **debug** since it's related to GDB integration and the ability to control the target's execution flow through debug commands.
\ No newline at end of file