diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/1886155')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/1886155 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/1886155 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/1886155 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3d5465c8a --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/1886155 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Alright, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's see what the problem is. + +The error message says: "error: argument 2 of '__atomic_load' discards 'const' qualifier". It's coming from GCC 11 during compilation. Looking at the file paths, it seems to be related to atomic operations in QEMU's codebase, specifically in `qht.c` and some header files. + +The error is about a function call where argument 2 loses a const qualifier. That usually means there's an issue with pointer types not matching exactly—like passing a non-const pointer where a const one is expected or vice versa. This isn't related to translation from source architecture to IR because it's more of a direct C code issue. + +So, this seems like a problem in the implementation layer rather than something related to machine translation or high-level language features. It's a compilation error due to type mismatches in function calls involving atomic operations. + +Looking at the categories provided, 'classify' probably refers to identifying what kind of bug this is. Since it's an issue with pointers and const qualifiers in function arguments, it doesn't fall under any of the specific hardware-related categories like machine translation or architecture-specific issues. Instead, it's a general coding error related to how pointers are handled. + +Therefore, the correct classification would be 'classify' as in it's a type of bug related to incorrect pointer handling or const qualifier mismatches. +</think> + +The bug is classified under: + +**C** + +This indicates that the issue relates to a C programming language problem, specifically involving pointers and const qualifiers. \ No newline at end of file |