summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1763
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1763')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/176319
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1763 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1763
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c0416ad1c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1763
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me start by understanding what's happening here.
+
+The user is reporting an issue where running `ldd /bin/ls` inside a Docker container on an amd64 host with the arm64v8/ubuntu image fails. The error message mentions that the platform doesn't match, and `ldd` exits with code 139.
+
+First, I know that `ldd` is used to display the shared libraries required by a program. In this case, it's failing when run under QEMU's aarch64 emulation. So, something is going wrong in how QEMU handles this process.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation is about incorrect mapping from source to target architecture. Since `ldd` might involve translating system calls and libraries for the emulated architecture, if there's an issue with that translation, it could cause `ldd` to fail.
+
+Other possibilities include device issues, but I don't see any hardware-specific problems mentioned here. It's not related to graphics or networking since those aren't part of this bug. Socket-related issues also don't seem relevant.
+
+The problem occurs in user-mode, as Docker is involved without needing full virtualization. So it's likely within the translation layer rather than the hypervisor or kernel itself.
+
+Performance and permissions are less likely here because the issue isn't about speed or access rights but about functionality failure during runtime.
+
+Considering all this, the most fitting category is 'mistranslation' because `ldd` relies on correctly translating system calls and library lookups between the emulated architecture (aarch64) and the host (amd64). If there's a mistake in how these translations are handled, it would lead to `ldd` failing as described.
+</think>
+
+mistranslation
\ No newline at end of file