diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/246')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/246 | 23 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/246 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/246 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..bcdf0575b --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/246 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +<think> +Alright, I'm looking at this bug report: "Build fails with 64 bits time_t". The task is to classify it into one of the given categories. Let me go through each possible category and see which one fits best. + +First, let's understand what the error message means. A build failure related to a 64-bit time_t suggests that there's an issue with how the code handles 64-bit integers, specifically the time_t type. Time_t is typically used for representing time in seconds since the epoch, and on 64-bit systems, it's usually defined as a 64-bit integer. + +Now, looking at the categories provided: + +- **mistranslation**: This refers to incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture to IR/target. It happens in user-mode assembly lowering. If there was an issue with how code is translated or lowered into assembly, this might fit, but I'm not sure yet. + +- **assembly**: Assembly lowering issues could cause build failures if the compiler can't generate correct assembly, especially related to data types. 64-bit time_t might be causing issues during compilation. + +- **other**: A catch-all category for anything that doesn't fit into the specific ones listed. + +Other categories like device, graphic, socket, network, etc., don't seem relevant here since the issue is about a build failure related to data type size. + +Considering the error occurs during the build process, it's likely due to compiler or linker issues. The time_t type might be causing alignment or size problems in 64-bit builds. Since this relates more to how the code is compiled rather than specific features like networking or graphics, I'm leaning towards 'assembly' as the category because assembly lowering involves handling data types and ensuring correct compilation. + +However, another angle is that it's a build configuration issue, which could fall under 'other'. But given that time_t is a C type and its handling can affect the generated assembly, it might be more related to how the code is translated into assembly during the build process. + +So, after considering both possibilities, I think the most fitting category is 'mistranslation' because it's about incorrect mapping from the source (C code with time_t) to the target IR or assembly. Alternatively, if the issue is purely in the compilation without involving translation layers, then maybe 'assembly'. But since QEMU involves a lot of architecture-specific code and translation between different architectures, 'mistranslation' seems appropriate. +</think> + +mistranslation \ No newline at end of file |