diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/489')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/489 | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/489 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/489 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..655d81f58 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/489 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +Looking at the problem description, an assertion fails when a breakpoint is hit in QEMU's AVR system. The error occurs in `translate-all.c` during code generation for translation blocks (TB). The error message is about `tb->size != 0`, which suggests that the TB size is zero when it shouldn't be. + +The user mentioned using GDB with remote debugging, but the issue arises specifically upon hitting a breakpoint. They also noted that stepping works and this problem doesn't occur in QEMU 6.0.0. + +This seems related to how QEMU handles breakpoints and translates instructions. Since it's about the translation process failing when a breakpoint is set, it might be an issue with the instruction lowering or the way breakpoints are handled in the TCG (Translation Coupled Guest) layer. However, since the error is during code generation for TBs, which is part of the translation process, this might not directly fall under 'assembly' but rather into issues within QEMU's own processing. + +The categories provided include 'mistranslation', which refers to incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture to target. Since the bug occurs when a breakpoint is hit during execution, it could be that the translation isn't correctly handling certain instructions or states when breakpoints are present, leading to an invalid TB being generated. This would fall under mistranslation as it's related to how the code is being translated and executed. + +Alternatively, since the issue is within the TCG layer and involves code generation for translation blocks, it could be a problem in 'other', but given that it's about incorrect mapping or handling during translation, 'mistranslation' seems more appropriate. +</think> + +The assertion failure occurs during the translation of code when a breakpoint is hit. The issue lies within the TCG layer where the translation block size is unexpectedly zero, which suggests an error in how the target code is being generated or handled upon hitting a breakpoint. This relates to the semantic mapping from source (AVR) to IR/target, making it a mistranslation issue. + +**Answer:** mistranslation \ No newline at end of file |