diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1038')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1038 | 34 |
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1038 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1038 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..57cdb770d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1038 @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's see what the bug is about. + +The user mentioned that on most targets, like KVM, the 'max' CPU model works as expected—either equivalent to 'host' or all available features. But on PPC64, using 'max' doesn't behave this way; it's aliased to an older model and doesn't work properly. They suggest removing 'max' or replacing it with something consistent across architectures. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +This seems related to CPU models and their behavior in QEMU. Since it's about how 'max' is handled differently on PPC64 compared to others, which might involve the way CPU features are exposed or emulated. The issue isn't with translation from source architecture to IR (so probably not mistranslation), nor does it seem related to assembly lowering. + +Considering the categories, 'cpu-model' behavior could fall under several areas, but none of the specific options directly match except possibly 'other', since the problem is about CPU model definitions and their aliases. Alternatively, it might relate to how the hypervisor (like KVM) handles CPUs, but since this is a PPC64 issue and not specifically KVM or another category listed. + +I think the most appropriate category here is 'cpu-model' behavior, which isn't explicitly listed, so the closest would be 'other'. Alternatively, perhaps it's more related to how the hypervisor handles CPU models. Wait, the user mentioned that on PPC64, 'max' doesn't work as expected, and suggests deleting or replacing it. This is about the configuration of the CPU model in QEMU. + +But looking at the options again: KVM is a possible category. Since the bug report compares other targets to KVM (where 'host' works), but for PPC64, it's not behaving like that. So maybe this is related to how KVM handles the CPU models. But I'm not entirely sure. + +Alternatively, since the problem is about the behavior of a specific QEMU option ('cpu max') and its mapping across architectures, perhaps 'mistranslation' applies if there's an incorrect semantic mapping for PPC64. However, 'mistranslation' usually refers to issues in code translation from one architecture to another. + +Wait, the user says that on other targets, 'max' is equivalent to 'host' (for KVM) or all features for TCG. But on PPC64, it's aliased to an older model and doesn't work. So this seems like a problem with how the 'max' CPU model is defined or handled in QEMU for PPC64. + +Since the issue is about CPU models not behaving consistently across architectures, I think 'mistranslation' might be applicable if there's a semantic mismatch between different targets. But perhaps it's more of an inconsistency in feature handling, so maybe 'other' is safer. +</think> + +The bug report discusses an inconsistency in how the 'max' CPU model behaves on PPC64 compared to other architectures. It isn't related to translation issues or specific features like graphics or network but rather a misconfiguration of CPU models. + +**Step-by-Step Explanation:** + +1. **Issue Identification**: The problem is with the 'max' CPU model not working as expected on PPC64, unlike other targets. +2. **Category Analysis**: It's related to CPU model definitions and their behavior across architectures. +3. **Possible Categories**: After evaluating options, it doesn't fit into specific categories like device or network but relates more to configuration issues. +4. **Conclusion**: The most fitting category is 'other' as the problem isn't covered by other explicit categories. + +**Answer:** + +other \ No newline at end of file |