summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/performance/1129957
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/performance/1129957')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/performance/112995711
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/performance/1129957 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/performance/1129957
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c954d3566
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/performance/1129957
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The user mentioned a performance issue when running a guest image on QEMU compiled for Win32. They compared it to running QEMU on Linux via VMware and using Wine, where it's faster.
+
+The first thing that comes to mind is that the problem relates to how well QEMU is performing on the Win32 platform. Since they're talking about performance differences across different setups, the primary issue seems to be with the speed of the emulator itself rather than any specific feature or component like device drivers or graphics.
+
+Looking at the categories, "performance" is one of them. The user explicitly mentions that there are performance issues, so this fits directly under that category. There's no mention of bugs in translation (mistranslation), assembly lowering (assembly), or other specific areas like network, graphic, or device-related problems.
+
+They also provided gprof logs which likely show where the performance bottlenecks are, but without looking into those specifics, the main issue is about the overall runtime performance. So, classifying this as "performance" makes sense because that's the core problem described.
+</think>
+
+performance
\ No newline at end of file