1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/performance/2821 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/performance/2821
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..77254dd99
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/performance/2821
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report mentions that emulated newer x86 chipsets are slower on CPU-bound loads when using certain "-cpu" options like "max" or "Icelake-Server-noTSX", compared to "qemu64". The user provided steps to reproduce the issue and some results showing lower performance with newer emulated CPUs.
+
+First, I'll look at the possible categories. The issue is about CPU performance differences between different CPU configurations in QEMU. It's not related to translation issues (mistranslation), nor does it seem to involve assembly lowering or other specific areas like graphics or networking. 
+
+The problem seems to be about how the emulated CPUs perform under load, which affects the overall speed of the virtual machine. This points towards a performance issue with the emulation of newer x86 processors in QEMU.
+
+Looking at the categories, "performance" fits because it's directly related to the CPU's ability to handle tasks efficiently. The other possible category could be "hypervisor", but that usually refers more to the management layer rather than the specific hardware emulation performance.
+
+So, I think the correct category is "performance".
+</think>
+
+The issue pertains to the performance of emulated CPUs in QEMU affecting the speed of CPU-bound tasks, which falls under the "performance" category.
+
+**Answer:** performance
\ No newline at end of file