1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/peripherals/304 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/peripherals/304
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9881c7376
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/peripherals/304
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have to classify this bug report: "assertion failure in mptsas1068 emulator". The possible categories are things like mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others.
+
+First, I need to understand what the bug is about. The mention of "mptsas1068 emulator" stands out. MPTSAS1068 sounds like a specific piece of hardware, perhaps a storage controller or something related to SCSI devices. So this might be part of QEMU's device emulation.
+
+Looking at the categories, I see 'device' and 'peripherals'. Device seems more general, while peripherals could refer to specific hardware components like storage controllers. Since mptsas1068 is likely a peripheral device emulator, the category should probably be under peripherals.
+
+But wait, let me think again. Could this be related to another area? The bug is an assertion failure, which might point towards a logic error in the code rather than a hardware issue. However, since it's specific to the mptsas1068 emulator, it's more about how that device is being emulated.
+
+So between 'device' and 'peripherals', I think 'peripherals' is more accurate because it refers to the emulated hardware components in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+The bug report mentions an assertion failure in the mptsas1068 emulator. Since mptsas1068 likely refers to a specific hardware component, probably related to storage or SCSI devices, this falls under the category of peripherals within QEMU's context.
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file