diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1042084')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1042084 | 25 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1042084 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1042084 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..718dfbd82 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1042084 @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report based on the given categories. Let's see what the problem is. + +The user mentioned that after updating seabios to the latest master, their Windows 7 guest can't boot anymore. They get a BSOD with an ACPI compliance error. Reverting the commit fixes it. + +First, let's think about what each category means. The options are things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. + +The issue is related to the BIOS because the user updated seabios. Seabios is part of QEMU's BIOS implementation for x86 guests. When they update it, their guest OS starts having issues during boot. + +The error message mentions ACPI compliance. That suggests that after the seabios update, Windows isn't seeing a fully compliant BIOS in terms of ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface). This could be due to changes in how the BIOS is emulated or implemented in the latest seabios version. + +Looking at the categories, "boot" seems relevant here because the issue occurs during the boot process. The guest OS can't complete the boot successfully after the update, leading to a BSOD. It's not related to network, graphics, sockets, or permissions directly, but rather the system's initialization and BIOS settings which affect hardware-level interactions. + +Another category that comes to mind is "hypervisor," since QEMU acts as a hypervisor when running virtual machines. However, in this case, the issue seems more specific to the BIOS/ACPI interaction during boot rather than the hypervisor itself. + +"Device" could also be a possibility if it's related to hardware emulation, but again, since it's a boot issue tied specifically to BIOS and ACPI, "boot" feels more accurate. The update in seabios affects how the virtual BIOS is presented to the guest OS, which impacts the boot process. + +I don't think it's about performance or kernel because the problem is manifesting at the initial boot stage, not with system slowdowns or kernel crashes. It's also not a debug issue; it's a functional failure during boot. + +So, putting it all together, the bug affects the guest OS's ability to boot correctly after an update in seabios. The category that best fits this scenario is "boot" because it directly relates to the boot process failing due to BIOS changes. +</think> + +The bug report involves an issue where updating seabios prevents a Windows 7 guest from booting, leading to a BSOD about ACPI compliance. Since this problem occurs during the boot process and relates to the BIOS/ACPI interaction, the most appropriate category is "boot." + +**Answer:** boot \ No newline at end of file |