diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/1888663')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/1888663 | 23 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/1888663 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/1888663 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ae8aaa5c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/1888663 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The bug report says that "msmouse not recognized in guest." Hmm, let me break this down. + +First, msmouse refers to the Microsoft mouse protocol, which is often used over a serial port. In QEMU, emulating hardware devices like mice involves several components: device emulation, how it's connected (PCI or ISA), and whether the guest OS can recognize it. + +The user tried different command-line options with qemu-system-i386, using various methods to configure the msmouse. They mentioned using -serial msmouse, -chardev, and -device options. It seems like they're trying to set up a serial mouse in their DOS guest but aren't having any luck. + +They also noted that when they check inside the guest with tools or debug statements, the mouse is initialized, and data is being sent, but it's not recognized. That suggests that QEMU might be sending the right signals, but the device isn't detected properly by the guest OS. + +Looking at the categories provided: there are options like device, which seems relevant because msmouse is a hardware device. Other categories include network, graphic, etc., but this issue is about a mouse, so it's more of a peripherals or input device problem. + +I should consider whether it's an issue with how QEMU emulates the mouse (device emulation) or perhaps a configuration problem in how the device is attached to the guest OS. Since the user tried different device configurations (-serial, -chardev, etc.), maybe it's related to how the device is connected, but that still falls under the device category. + +Alternatively, could it be a bug in translating the mouse input from QEMU's emulation layer? That would relate more to assembly or translation issues, but the user didn't mention any problems with other parts of the system—just the mouse not being recognized. So I'm leaning towards 'device' because it's about hardware emulation. + +I think the best fit here is 'device' since the issue revolves around the msmouse device not being correctly recognized by the guest OS, despite QEMU sending data as expected. +</think> + +The bug report indicates an issue with the mouse not being recognized in the guest OS. The user attempted various configurations to set up msmouse emulation using different QEMU command-line options. Despite the mouse initializing and transmitting data, it isn't detected by the guest. + +This points to a problem within device emulation, specifically how the mouse device is being handled by QEMU. Therefore, the appropriate category for this bug is: + +device \ No newline at end of file |