1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/2228 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/2228
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..98da8b192
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/2228
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to figure out the category for this bug report from QEMU. The error is in hw/core/gpio.c at line 108, and it's an assertion failure where n is not within the expected range for the gpio_list->num_in.
+
+First, looking at the error message: qdev_get_gpio_in_named is failing because the index 'n' is either negative or exceeds the number of available inputs. This suggests there's a problem with how GPIO pins are being accessed or managed in QEMU.
+
+The steps to reproduce involve running specific machine types like qcom-dc-scm-v1-bmc, fby35-bmc, or yosemitev2-bmc with certain devices attached—max1111, max1110, or corgi-ssp. These seem to be different board configurations and devices that use GPIO.
+
+GPIO in QEMU typically relates to the General Purpose Input/Output pins, which are part of device emulation. So when a device is added (like these max devices), it's likely that there's an issue with how the GPIO pins are being handled by the machine or device setup.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: device makes sense because the problem occurs when adding specific devices to the QEMU system. It's not about assembly translation, performance, or network; it's more about how devices interact with the hardware emulation, specifically their GPIO interfaces.
+
+So I think 'device' is the right category here since the bug arises from device configuration causing an invalid GPIO access.
+</think>
+
+The error occurs when adding specific devices that rely onGPIO pins. Since this involves device interaction and GPIO management during machine setup, the appropriate category is:
+
+**device**
\ No newline at end of file