diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/2478')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/2478 | 15 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/2478 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/2478 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..bb07c12ef --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/2478 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, I'm looking at this bug report for QEMU related to the STM32F1 and STM32VLDicovery board. The issue is that when running a program using libopencm3's clock initialization, it hangs because the HSERDY bit in the RCC_CR register isn't being set as expected. + +The user mentioned that they can reproduce the problem by cloning the libopencm3-examples repository and running specific steps with QEMU. They also provided a link to the STM32F1 reference manual, which explains that the HSERDY bit indicates whether the external high-speed oscillator is ready. In real hardware, this bit should be set after 6 cycles of the HSE clock. + +Looking at the categories given, I need to determine where this bug falls. The problem seems to stem from how QEMU emulates the hardware behavior. Specifically, the RCC_CR register's HSERDY bit isn't being set during clock initialization, which is causing the test to fail because the emulation isn't behaving like real hardware. + +The possible categories include "mistranslation," "assembly," "other," and several others. Since this issue relates to how QEMU emulates a specific hardware component (the RCC_CR register), it's likely under the "hardware emulation" or similar category. However, looking at the provided options, the closest fit would be "device" since it involves an external oscillator (a hardware device) not being properly emulated. + +I think the bug is in the way QEMU handles the clock initialization for the STM32F1 devices. Since the HSERDY bit isn't set as expected in the emulation, this indicates a problem with how the hardware is being modeled or emulated within QEMU. Therefore, it's categorized under "device." +</think> + +The bug report describes an issue where QEMU does not correctly emulate the behavior of the RCC_CR register's HSERDY bit on the STM32F1 device. Since this involves incorrect hardware emulation, particularly in the handling of a specific hardware component (the clock control register), the appropriate category is: + +device \ No newline at end of file |