1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/2538 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/2538
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..26ac9e689
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/2538
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user mentioned an error when trying to enter the LoongArch64 UEFI shell. The error message is about a failed assertion in virt.c:118, specifically that 'real_size' isn't aligned with 'VIRT_FLASH_SECTOR_SIZE'. 
+
+Looking at the categories provided, I need to determine which one fits best. The possible options include things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, etc.
+
+The error seems related to how memory or storage is being managed, especially since it's talking about sector alignment in flash mapping. This sounds more like a hardware-specific issue rather than something wrong with the translation between source and target architectures. 
+
+Considering the categories, 'device' might be relevant because it's dealing with how the virtual device (like the flash) is being handled. Alternatively, it could also relate to storage or memory management, but those aren't listed as specific categories here.
+
+Wait, another thought: The error occurs during the creation of a VM usingvirt-manager, specifically when creating an empty UEFI bare metal setup. It might be related to how the virtual machine's hardware components are being set up, which falls under device handling in QEMU.
+
+So, putting it all together, I think 'device' is the most appropriate category here because it pertains to the hardware emulation or configuration within QEMU.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an assertion failure during flash mapping due to misalignment. This relates to how storage devices are handled in QEMU. Therefore, the category is:
+
+device
\ No newline at end of file