1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/961757 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/961757
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..6a1a634d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/961757
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The possible categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report is about a wrong error message in blockdev-snapshot-sync. From the context provided, it seems like when creating a snapshot file, there's an issue with how errors are reported. Specifically, if bdrv_find_protocol(snapshot_file) returns null, the code incorrectly uses QERR_INVALID_BLOCK_FORMAT and refers to "format" instead of the correct "scheme".
+
+So, looking at what this function is doing: blockdev-snapshot-sync deals with block devices and snapshots. It's part of QEMU, which involves device emulation and handling storage.
+
+The issue here is related to error reporting when trying to create or access a snapshot file. The problem isn't about translation between architectures (mistranslation) or assembly code lowering (assembly). It's more specific to how block devices handle snapshots and their protocols.
+
+Considering the categories, "device" seems appropriate because it relates to block device handling. Alternatively, "files" could be considered since it's about file operations, but "blockdev-snapshot-sync" is a device-related function.
+
+The main problem isn't with the hypervisor or kernel but with how devices (specifically block devices) are being handled in terms of their protocols and error messages. Therefore, the category should be "device".
+</think>
+
+device
\ No newline at end of file