summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/graphic/1087974
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/graphic/1087974')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/graphic/108797413
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/graphic/1087974 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/graphic/1087974
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9fa55b5e8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/graphic/1087974
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The user provided a list including mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, etc.
+
+Looking at the bug report: it's about VNC producing garbled output when using Tight PNG compression. This sounds like a display issue related to how images or graphics are being handled in the VNC implementation.
+
+The categories that stand out are 'graphic' and possibly 'vnc'. Since the problem is specifically with VNC's graphical rendering, I think 'graphic' is more appropriate because it relates directly to visual output issues. The category 'vnc' is also relevant, but 'graphic' might be broader in this context.
+
+I should choose the most fitting one. Given that the issue is about image compression and display artifacts, 'graphic' seems to capture the essence better.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses an issue with VNC's graphical output when using Tight PNG compression, leading to scrambled desktop parts. This relates directly to how graphics are handled during rendering or compression in the VNC implementation.
+
+**Answer:** graphic
\ No newline at end of file