diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/graphic/1618122')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/graphic/1618122 | 13 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/graphic/1618122 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/graphic/1618122 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d74c75e43 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/graphic/1618122 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's figure out how to categorize this bug report about QEMU. The user is complaining that using `qemu-monitor`'s screendump function is very slow and uses a significant amount of CPU, around 10-20% on one core. They provided a Valgrind report which shows high Ir (instruction re executions) in `libpixman`, specifically pointing to functions like `__memcpy_sse2_unaligned` and `pixman_image_composite32`. + +The user also mentions that there have been reports of `libpixman` being 8 times slower in newer releases. They tried looking into the issue but couldn't find where the raw display buffer starts, especially with the `DisplaySurface` structure which includes a `pixman_image_t`. + +So, thinking about possible categories: The problem is related to performance issues during a specific operation (screendump) that's tied to the graphical output. The user is dealing with how the image is captured and written, which falls under the graphics aspect of QEMU. + +They tried to avoid using `libpixman` by manually handling the memcpy for PPM or BMP files but couldn't find the raw buffer. This suggests it's a performance issue in the graphical part of QEMU. + +Looking at the categories provided: graphic seems like the most fitting because it's about display operations and image handling, which are graphics-related tasks. Other options like 'performance' might also apply, but the primary issue is with the graphics subsystem causing high CPU usage. +</think> + +graphic \ No newline at end of file |