diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1704')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1704 | 37 |
1 files changed, 37 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1704 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1704 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2071b596d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1704 @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +<think> +Alright, I need to figure out why the user's build is failing. They provided a list of commits they've tested using git bisect, marking some as good and others as bad. The goal here is to identify which commit introduced the bug causing the build failure. + +Looking at their output, each line starts with either "good" or "bad," followed by a commit hash and a brief description. It seems like they're performing a binary search on the commit history to isolate where the problem started. + +The first bad commit they've identified is `e6dd5e782becfe6d51f3575c086f5bd7162421d0`, which relates to using `tcg_gen_qemu_{ld, st}_i128` in the SVE (Scalar Vector Extension) code. The good commits around this are likely earlier or later than this bad commit. + +I should consider that the issue might be due to incorrect usage of TCG (Translation Guest Code) functions in the target/arm code. Specifically, `gen_sve_{ld,st}r` probably deals with memory operations for vectors, and using `tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i128` or `st_i128` might not handle certain cases correctly. + +To pinpoint the problem, I can suggest checking the changes introduced by that bad commit. Maybe it's introducing a bug where the SVE instructions aren't being translated properly, leading to build failures or runtime errors. + +I should also consider if there are any test cases related to SVE operations that might have started failing after this commit. Running those tests could help confirm whether the issue lies in the code changes made at `e6dd5e7`. + +Additionally, reviewing the surrounding commits for any dependencies or related changes might shed light on why this particular change is causing problems. Perhaps another commit was supposed to handle some edge cases that aren't being addressed here. + +Finally, it would be useful to look into the error messages generated during the build to see if there's a specific warning or failure message pointing towards issues with TCG functions or SVE handling. +</think> + +Based on the information provided and the analysis of the git bisect output, the first bad commit identified is: + +``` +# bad: [e6dd5e782becfe6d51f3575c086f5bd7162421d0] target/arm: Use tcg_gen_qemu_{ld, st}_i128 in gen_sve_{ld, st}r +``` + +This commit appears to be the first one marked as "bad" during your bisect process. Therefore, it is likely the source of the issue causing your build failure or other problems you are encountering. + +To further diagnose the problem, I recommend: + +1. **Review the Commit**: Look into the changes made in this commit (`e6dd5e782becfe6d51f3575c086f5bd7162421d0`) to understand what might be causing the build failure. + +2. **Check Build Logs**: If you have access to the build logs, look for specific errors or warnings that occurred after this commit was introduced. + +3. **Revert the Commit**: As a troubleshooting step, you could try reverting this commit to see if the build succeeds and the issue is resolved. + +4. **Test Incrementally**: If possible, test each subsequent commit (after `e6dd5e782becfe6d51f3575c086f5bd7162421d0`) incrementally to see if any later changes fix the issue or worsen it. + +Let me know if you need further assistance! \ No newline at end of file |