1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1811499 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1811499
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..47189cac4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1811499
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user provided a code snippet from QEMU and asked for it to be categorized into one of several predefined categories.
+
+Looking at the code, I see that there are two identical blocks of if statements checking `ppkt->tcp_seq == spkt->tcp_seq` and `ppkt->seq_end == spkt->seq_end`. The same condition is repeated twice, which suggests duplication. The user even mentioned it's a "possible pointless code duplication" in the bug report.
+
+Now, I need to match this issue to one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem here isn't about translating code incorrectly (mistranslation) or related to assembly lowering. It's also not a bug that falls into any of the specific areas like network device drivers (device), graphics handling (graphic), sockets (socket), etc. Instead, it's an issue with duplicate code, which doesn't fit neatly into any of those categories.
+
+Therefore, this seems to be a general code quality issue rather than something specific to QEMU's subsystems. The category that best fits such a problem is "other."
+</think>
+
+The bug report points out a possible duplication in the code where two identical if blocks are present. Since the issue is related to redundant code within the source, it doesn't fall under any of the more specific categories like network or socket but rather a general code quality concern.
+
+**Answer: other**
+
+```plaintext
+other
+```
\ No newline at end of file