diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/2184')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/2184 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/2184 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/2184 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..83386cb74 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/2184 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user is upgrading from version 4.1.0 to 8.2.1 and is encountering issues when resuming a hibernated guest. They added the machine type `pc-q35-4.1` to maintain compatibility, but upon resume, there are errors related to NVMe devices and kernel panics. + +First, looking at the error messages, they mention "nvme0: Device not ready" and several read errors on the swap device. This suggests that the NVMe controller isn't initializing correctly when resuming under QEMU 8.2.1. The user also references a patch regarding BAR layout changes in the NVMe code, implying that hardware configuration might have altered between versions. + +The key point here is that the user expected the underlying HW, including devices, to remain unchanged when selecting the `-machine` option. However, it seems that the BAR layout for NVMe has changed, which affects device initialization during resume. + +Looking at the possible categories: Mistranslation relates to incorrect semantic mapping in user-mode assembly. This doesn't seem relevant here because the issue is hardware-related, not a translation problem. The other options like storage, network, etc., might be more specific, but the root cause seems tied to how the device's configuration space (BAR) is being handled. + +Since the issue stems from changes in the device's BAR layout affecting compatibility between QEMU versions during hibernation-resume cycles, it's likely related to hardware configuration or device initialization. However, the classification options provided don't include a specific "hardware" category beyond storage and network. Given that the problem is about device configuration and not about data transfer or networking, I might lean towards storage as the closest fit. + +Alternatively, since the issue arises from a change in the BAR layout which affects how devices are exposed to the guest OS, it could also be seen as a hardware configuration problem within QEMU's emulated devices. But if we have to choose among the given options, "storage" is probably the most appropriate because NVMe relates to storage controllers. +</think> + +The bug report involves issues with resuming a guest after an upgrade of QEMU versions, specifically related to changes in NVMe device configuration (BAR layout). This impacts hardware initialization and compatibility. The most fitting classification among provided options is: + +**Storage** + +This categorization aligns because the problem pertains to how storage devices (NVMe) are configured during the resume process, indicating a hardware-related issue within QEMU's emulation. \ No newline at end of file |