diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1052857')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1052857 | 23 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1052857 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1052857 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6ec6d6a1e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1052857 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +<think> +Alright, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully. + +The user is reporting an issue when compiling QEMU-user statically for PowerPC on a 64-bit host. They set up a chroot environment using debootstrap and tried running the binary inside it, but it fails with a specific assertion error in signal.c. The same problem occurs even with the latest source code from the git repository. + +Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The error seems to be related to how QEMU handles signals or the environment it's running in. The assertion failure is in setup_frame, which suggests a problem with how function frames are being set up for the guest process. Since this happens when using a statically linked binary, it might be an issue with the way the user-space code is handling certain aspects of the target architecture (PowerPC) on a 64-bit host. + +The error occurs during the chroot execution, indicating that it's not a kernel or hypervisor issue per se but rather something related to how QEMU translates instructions or sets up the environment for the guest. It doesn't seem to be about device emulation, graphics, networking, or KVM. The problem is occurring at runtime when running user-mode code, which points towards a possible translation issue. + +The key part here is that it's specific to the user-mode binary and its interaction with the host's architecture (64-bit). This suggests an issue in how QEMU maps the guest instructions to the host's instruction set or perhaps in handling certain system calls or signal handlers correctly when running as a static binary. + +Given that, mistranslation seems like the most appropriate category because it involves incorrect semantic mapping from the source architecture (PowerPC) to the target (x86_64), which is happening in user-mode. The problem isn't with assembly lowering (assembly category) but rather with how the overall translation or setup of the guest environment is handled. + +So, I think the correct classification here is "mistranslation." +</think> + +The issue arises from incorrect handling during translation when running a statically linked QEMU binary on a 64-bit host. This points to a problem in mapping the PowerPC instructions correctly in user-mode, fitting under mistranslation. + +**Answer:** + +mistranslation \ No newline at end of file |