diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1123')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1123 | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1123 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1123 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2c1725873 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1123 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's read through the problem description and figure out which category it fits best. + +The bug is about a CAN controller in the Xilinx ZynqMP board. The specific issue is in the function `update_rx_fifo()`, where there seems to be a typo or logical error mixing RX and TX buffers. Looking at the code provided, I notice that when pushing data into the RX fifo, they're using deposit32 with parameters that seem to refer to TXFIFO instead of RXFIFO. + +In the original code, for example, they have `R_TXFIFO_DATA1_DB3_SHIFT` in the deposit32 calls. That's part of the FIFO used for transmitting data, but here it's being used in the receive path. The proposed fix changes these to use RXFIFO-related defines like `R_RXFIFO_DATA1_DB3_SHIFT`. So this is definitely a bug where they're using the wrong constants for the RX buffer. + +Now, looking at the possible categories: Mistranslation refers to incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture to IR/target. That could involve using the wrong registers or mappings in the code, which seems to be exactly what's happening here. The CAN controller is mistakenly using TXFIFO parameters in RX handling, leading to a logical error. + +Other possibilities like assembly lowering (assembly) don't fit because this isn't related to generating assembly code. It's more about using incorrect constants in the C code. Device or peripherals might be relevant since it's hardware-related, but the core issue is the misuse of mappings, which fits better under mistranslation. + +So I think the correct category here is "mistranslation" because it's an error in how the RX and TX channels are being mapped or handled in the code. +</think> + +The bug involves using incorrect constants intended for the TXFIFO in the RX processing, leading to a logical error. This fits under "mistranslation" as it's about wrong semantic mappings. + +**Answer:** mistranslation \ No newline at end of file |