summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1178
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1178')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/117811
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1178 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1178
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fff392b00
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1178
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. The user mentioned: "is that riscv64 `feq.s` only should consider the lowest 32-bits." 
+
+First, I need to understand what this is about. RISC-V is an instruction set architecture, and `feq.s` is a floating-point instruction in RISC-V. The comment suggests that this instruction is only considering the lower 32 bits, which might be a problem.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation refers to incorrect mapping from source to target, often in user-mode assembly. Since `feq.s` is an assembly-level instruction and its handling could involve semantic translation issues, this seems relevant. Other categories like device or network don't fit here since they're about hardware components, not software instructions.
+
+I think the issue lies in how QEMU translates the RISC-V instruction into the target architecture's IR, possibly mishandling 64-bit vs. 32-bit parts. So mistranslation is likely the correct category.
+</think>
+
+mistranslation
\ No newline at end of file