diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1568107')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1568107 | 21 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1568107 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1568107 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a207a4c8a --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1568107 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +<think> +Okay, I'm trying to figure out how to classify the given bug report. The user provided a bug report from QEMU where running a specific binary under qemu-x86_64 on ARM results in an error: "setup_rt_frame: not implemented" followed by a segmentation fault. + +First, I'll look at the possible categories they mentioned: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. + +The error message "setup_rt_frame: not implemented" suggests that there's a missing function or part of the code that QEMU relies on when running in user mode on an ARM host emulating x86_64. This is likely related to how user-mode processes are handled, specifically the setup of the run-time frame for exceptions or signals. + +Looking into what "setup_rt_frame" does: In QEMU's target-specific code, functions like this are responsible for setting up the environment when running a translated guest OS under user mode. If it's not implemented, it means that QEMU doesn't have the necessary support to handle certain operations in user-mode on that specific host/target combination. + +The bug occurs when trying to run a 64-bit x86 binary on an ARM system using qemu-x86_64. This falls under user-mode emulation because the guest OS is running as a user process on the host, not as a hypervisor or kernel mode VM. Therefore, it's related to how QEMU translates and sets up the environment for user processes. + +Since the issue is about an unimplemented function in user-mode translation, it doesn't fit into categories like device, graphic, network, etc., which are more about hardware emulation or I/O. It also isn't performance-related because the problem is a missing implementation rather than slow execution. + +The closest category would be "mistranslation," as it pertains to issues in the semantic mapping from the source architecture (x86_64) to the target (ARM), which happens during user-mode assembly lowering or setup. However, since the function isn't implemented at all, it might fall under a broader issue. + +Alternatively, considering that "mistranslation" refers more to incorrect mappings rather than missing features, another possible category is "other." But given the context of translation issues in user-mode, "mistranslation" seems closer. +</think> + +The bug report indicates an unimplemented function during user-mode execution on ARM, which relates to QEMU's setup for x86_64 binaries. This points to a missing feature in the user-mode translation layer. + +Answer: mistranslation \ No newline at end of file |