diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1746943')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1746943 | 23 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1746943 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1746943 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..86c6bfec6 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1746943 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully. + +The user is using qemu-aarch64-static inside a Docker container based on an aarch64 image. When they run ps or top commands, QEMU throws an uncaught target signal 11, which is a segmentation fault. They tried different versions of QEMU (2.10-2.11) from various distributions and encountered the same issue. They also linked a related Red Hat bug report. + +Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The error is a segmentation fault when running commands in the container. Segfaults are often due to issues with memory access, which could relate to how QEMU handles certain operations or translations. Since it's happening inside a Docker container and involves QEMU's static binary, it might be related to how QEMU translates instructions or manages the environment. + +The bug report mentions that it occurs when running ps/top, which are system utilities. This suggests that maybe there's an issue with how QEMU handles these commands, possibly in the assembly lowering phase or instruction translation. Alternatively, it could be a kernel-related issue or something to do with permissions or file handling within the container. + +However, segmentation faults can sometimes be due to issues in the hypervisor or how the emulation is set up, but I'm not sure if that's directly related here. The fact that this happens across different distributions and QEMU versions might indicate a more fundamental issue in the way QEMU handles certain operations when running as a static binary inside a container. + +Another angle: since it's related to running commands within a container, maybe it's an issue with how QEMU interacts with the container environment, possibly affecting device or kernel-related functions. But I'm leaning towards this being a translation issue because segmentation faults often stem from incorrect memory access patterns, which could happen if QEMU isn't correctly translating instructions for the target architecture. + +Wait, but "mistranslation" is specifically about semantic mapping errors in user-mode assembly. If the segfault occurs when running commands, it might be that QEMU isn't handling certain system calls or instructions correctly during translation, leading to invalid memory accesses. + +Alternatively, it could fall under 'other' if it's not fitting into any of the more specific categories like device, network, etc. But since it's a segfault related to instruction translation, I think 'mistranslation' might be the closest fit. +</think> + +The bug report describes a segmentation fault when running system commands within a Docker container using QEMU-aarch64-static. This suggests an issue with how QEMU translates instructions or handles memory access during emulation. The problem occurs across different distributions and versions, pointing to a fundamental translation error rather than environment-specific factors. + +Answer: mistranslation \ No newline at end of file |