diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1830864')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1830864 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1830864 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1830864 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..601d8ed6e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1830864 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU. The user provided a detailed bug report where an assertion failed when trying to launch a 32-bit ARM guest with KVM acceleration on an AArch64 host. + +Looking at the error message: the assertion in cpu.c is failing because it's checking for either no_aa32 or if the CPU has the div feature. The user intended to run a 32-bit guest, so maybe there's an issue with how the ARM features are being handled for AArch32 on an AArch64 host. + +The categories given include things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, etc. I'm thinking this might be related to the CPU configuration or feature flags when using KVM. The error message comes from the CPU realization function, which suggests it's about how the CPU is being set up, possibly in the target architecture handling. + +The user tried to run a 32-bit guest on an AArch64 host with KVM. Maybe the issue arises because the KVM acceleration isn't correctly supporting the 32-bit mode or the feature flags aren't properly handled. Since this is during CPU setup, it's likely related to how QEMU maps the target architecture features when using KVM. + +Considering the categories, 'mistranslation' refers to incorrect semantic mapping in user-mode, which doesn't seem right here because this is about the target CPU configuration. 'Device' might be relevant if it's a hardware device issue, but I don't see evidence of that. 'Kernel' or 'hypervisor' could be involved since KVM is part of the hypervisor layer. + +But looking deeper, the problem seems to stem from how QEMU configures the ARM CPU features when running in 32-bit mode under KVM on an AArch64 host. The assertion failure indicates that either no_aa32 isn't true or the div feature isn't set correctly. This could be a setup issue within QEMU's target architecture handling, possibly falling under 'mistranslation' if it's about how features are being translated or mapped. + +Alternatively, since KVM is involved and it's part of the hypervisor layer, maybe the bug lies in how QEMU interacts with the hypervisor when setting up the guest's CPU features. But I'm not entirely sure; perhaps 'mistranslation' is more appropriate because it's about feature mapping during target setup. +</think> + +The bug report indicates an issue with the ARM CPU configuration when running a 32-bit guest on an AArch64 host using KVM. The assertion failure suggests a problem in how QEMU handles ARM features, likely during target architecture setup or feature flag management. Given that it's related to CPU realization and feature checks, the most fitting classification is: + +**Answer:** 'mistranslation' \ No newline at end of file |