1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1859291 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1859291
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fc36cc0ea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1859291
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to classify this bug report about QEMU. The issue is that when using 'ecall' from supervisor mode, a user exception is raised instead of the expected supervisor exception. So, first, I need to understand what each category means.
+
+The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+Looking at the bug report, it's related to RISC-V and exception handling. The function mentioned is 'trans_ecall' in 'trans_priviledged.inc.c'. Since this involves generating exceptions when certain instructions are executed from a specific mode (supervisor), it's likely about how QEMU translates these instructions into the target architecture.
+
+Mistranslation refers to incorrect semantic mapping from source to IR/target, which happens in user-mode. This seems relevant because the exception type is being incorrectly translated—user exception instead of supervisor. So, it's an issue with how the instruction 'ecall' is handled during translation.
+
+Other categories like device or network don't fit here since this isn't about hardware devices or networking. Similarly, permissions might be related but not directly to the exception handling in this context.
+
+Therefore, I think the correct category for this bug report is "mistranslation."
+</think>
+
+The bug involves incorrect exception generation when using 'ecall' from supervisor mode, which points to a translation issue in how QEMU handles RISC-V instructions. 
+
+**Answer:** mistranslation
\ No newline at end of file