1 files changed, 37 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/271 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/271
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..74bf4f0ea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/271
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report is titled "ARM cpu emulation regression on QEMU 4.2.0". Let me break this down.
+
+First, the issue is with ARM CPU emulation, which suggests it's related to how QEMU emulates ARM processors. Now, looking at the categories, I need to see which one fits best.
+
+Mistranslation would be about incorrect mapping from source to target architecture in user-mode. That might relate if there's a problem in the translation of instructions, but the report doesn't specify that specifically.
+
+Assembly lowering is about converting high-level IR to assembly code, so again, unless it's about code generation issues, this might not fit.
+
+Other category is for anything else, but perhaps more specific categories exist here.
+
+Looking at device: if the issue was with a particular hardware device being emulated incorrectly, that would fit. But this is about CPU emulation, which is more of a core functionality rather than a device.
+
+Graphic, socket, network don't seem relevant here as the bug is about CPU, not I/O or networking.
+
+KVM is a hypervisor technology, and QEMU does support KVM for virtualization. If the issue was with KVM integration, that could be it, but the report mentions ARM CPU emulation specifically, which might not necessarily tie directly to KVM unless it's a regression in how QEMU uses KVM for ARM.
+
+Boot: if the issue is about booting an ARM VM, maybe, but again, the problem is more about CPU emulation itself rather than boot process.
+
+VNC, debug, files, permissions, performance: none of these seem directly related to CPU emulation issues.
+
+Kernel: might be relevant if it's a problem with how QEMU interacts with the host kernel when emulating ARM CPUs, but I'm not sure that's the case here.
+
+Peripherals: these are hardware devices emulated by QEMU. Since this is about the CPU, which is more of a core component rather than a peripheral device, maybe not.
+
+Hypervisor: since KVM is a hypervisor and QEMU often uses it for full virtualization, if the issue is that the CPU emulation under KVM isn't working correctly in version 4.2.0, then perhaps it's related to hypervisor functionality. But again, the report says "ARM cpu emulation", not specifically tied to KVM.
+
+So, considering all this, none of the more specific categories like device, network, KVM, etc., seem to perfectly fit. The issue is about CPU emulation in general for ARM, which could be part of how QEMU emulates the instruction set or handles virtualization at a lower level. Since there's no direct category for CPU emulation itself, but looking back, "other" is an option.
+
+Wait, let me double-check: perhaps it's not under any specific category except maybe "other". Alternatively, since CPU emulation might relate to how instructions are translated (mistranslation), but the bug report doesn't mention anything about user-mode or instruction translation specifically. It just says a regression in ARM CPU emulation.
+
+So, given that, I think the best fit is either "hypervisor" if it's related to KVM support for ARM CPUs, or perhaps "other". But since hypervisor would be more specific if it's about KVM, but without knowing if KVM was involved, maybe it's safer to go with "other".
+</think>
+
+other
\ No newline at end of file