1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1915327 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1915327
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..35dfbd0a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1915327
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU's behavior with the cmpxchg instruction. Let me start by understanding what's going on here.
+
+The user provided a C program that uses inline assembly to perform a cmpxchg operation. The expected result is that if the values are equal, the accumulator (RAX) should remain unchanged. On a real CPU, when they run this code, RAX stays as 0x1234567812345678, which makes sense because cmpxchg doesn't modify the register in that case.
+
+But when running the same program under QEMU's x86_64 TCG (Translation Cache Generic), the result is different. RAX becomes 0x12345678, which looks like only the lower half of the original value. This suggests that QEMU is zero-extending EAX to RAX instead of keeping the full 64 bits.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. The issue here seems to be with how QEMU handles the cmpxchg instruction. Specifically, it's not matching real CPU behavior because of an incorrect handling of the registers, probably during translation or execution of that instruction.
+
+So, this isn't a problem with a system call (syscall) or something happening at runtime unrelated to specific instructions (runtime). Instead, it's directly about how QEMU processes the cmpxchg instruction. Therefore, the correct category should be "instruction."
+</think>
+
+The bug report concerns incorrect handling of the cmpxchg instruction in QEMU, leading to unexpected register behavior. This falls under the category of an instruction issue.
+
+**Answer:** instruction
\ No newline at end of file