diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1735384')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1735384 | 21 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1735384 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1735384 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..55985aa70 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1735384 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to figure out how to classify this bug report about OpenJDK JVM segfaulting on qemu-sh4 as part of QEMU. The possible categories are instruction, syscall, or runtime. + +First, let me understand what's happening. The user is reporting that when they run Java with the newer version, it crashes with a segmentation fault, but an older version works fine. They mentioned it's related to recent changes in OpenJDK, which introduced this regression. + +Now, looking at the categories: + +1. **Instruction**: This would involve a specific faulty instruction causing the issue. Maybe something like incorrect assembly code or miscompiled bytecode. +2. **Syscall**: This relates to issues when interacting with system calls. For example, if a syscall is returning an error or not handled properly. +3. **Runtime**: Other runtime errors that don't fall into instructions or syscalls. Could be memory management issues, threading problems, etc. + +In this case, the JVM crashes on startup with a segfault. Segmentation faults usually point to memory access issues—like accessing uninitialized pointers, invalid memory addresses, or buffer overflows. Since it's happening on qemu-sh4, which is an emulator for SH4 architecture, maybe there's a problem in how the JVM handles memory on this platform. + +Considering that the issue started after recent changes, it might be related to new code that isn't correctly handling the SH4 architecture within QEMU. Perhaps something in the garbage collector or native method handling has regressed, leading to improper memory access. + +It's less likely a syscall issue because the error occurs right at JVM startup when calling -version, which doesn't involve many syscalls yet. Also, the fact that an older version works suggests it's not a fundamental compatibility problem but something introduced in newer code. + +So, this seems like a runtime error because it's crashing during execution, likely due to memory management or handling specific to the SH4 architecture in QEMU. +</think> + +runtime \ No newline at end of file |