diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1836078')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1836078 | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1836078 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1836078 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c112f41c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1836078 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Alright, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's break down the information provided. + +The user is reporting regressions when running GCC tests on the arm-linux-gnueabihf target using a recent version of QEMU (master branch). They mention that all tests used to pass but now cause QEMU to crash after applying a specific fix. The tests involve binaries, shared libraries, and a script. + +The possible categories are: + +1. **Instruction**: This would be if the issue is related to how certain CPU instructions are handled. +2. **Syscall**: If the problem involves system calls not working as expected. +3. **Runtime**: Any other runtime issues that don't fall into the above two categories. + +Given the context, the user isn't pointing out a specific instruction or syscall failure but rather general crashes when running tests. This suggests it's a broader runtime issue affecting how QEMU handles these test cases after the fix. Therefore, the category is likely **runtime**. +</think> + +The bug report involves general runtime issues causing QEMU to crash during GCC tests, not specifically tied to instructions or syscalls. + +runtime \ No newline at end of file |