1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/2460 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/2460
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..628882b87
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/2460
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm looking at this problem where someone noticed that QEMU-x86_64 performance dropped significantly starting from version 3 on an aarch64 host when running CoreMark. They provided a table showing coremark scores for various QEMU versions.
+
+First, I need to classify the issue into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime.
+
+Considering that the problem is about performance degradation over different QEMU versions, it's likely related to how QEMU handles instructions or emulates x86-64 on aarch64. The user mentioned running in user-mode, so it's probably not a kernel issue but rather something within the emulator.
+
+Looking at possible causes, I recall that QEMU uses various methods for CPU emulation, like dynamic translation (Tcg) or just-in-time compilation (JIT). Changes in how these are implemented between versions could affect performance. For instance, if newer versions introduced less efficient code paths or optimizations that didn't play well with aarch64.
+
+The drop from version 2.x to 3.x is stark—like from ~4500 to ~1167. That suggests some fundamental change in the way instructions are handled or translated. Maybe there was a switch in translation backends or changes in how system calls (syscalls) were handled, but since the issue persists across multiple versions beyond 3.0, it's more about an ongoing problem with instruction handling.
+
+So, considering these points, the category is likely "instruction" because the performance drop relates to how instructions are emulated rather than a specific syscall or runtime error.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file