diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2592')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2592 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2592 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2592 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7c78666d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2592 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The user mentioned that when they run `time.time()` in Python using qemu-aarch64, it throws an OSError: [Errno 0] Error. They're certain it's a QEMU issue because the same build works on a physical aarch64 machine and doesn't have this problem with qemu-arm. + +First, I need to understand what `time.time()` does. It returns the current time in seconds since the epoch. Under the hood, Python uses system calls to get this information. So when running under QEMU, something might be going wrong with how these system calls are handled. + +The error message says OSError: [Errno 0] Error. Errno 0 is a bit unusual because it usually indicates a successful operation, but in this case, it's an error. That suggests that the underlying system call isn't behaving as expected when run through QEMU-aarch64. + +Looking at the possible categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. + +- Instruction issues would involve problems with specific CPU instructions not being emulated correctly. +- Syscall issues relate to how system calls are handled by the emulator. +- Runtime errors could be anything else happening during execution. + +Since `time.time()` is a Python function that uses the underlying system's `gettimeofday` or similar syscalls, this points towards a problem with how QEMU-aarch64 emulates these syscalls. The fact that it works correctly on real hardware and with qemu-arm indicates that the issue is specific to the aarch64 emulation in QEMU. + +Therefore, the bug is likely related to how QEMU handles certain system calls when running in aarch64 mode. This suggests it's a syscall-related issue. +</think> + +syscall \ No newline at end of file |