diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/2702')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/2702 | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/2702 b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/2702 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8e51c1d58 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/2702 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to figure out whether this bug in QEMU is user-mode or system-mode related. Let me start by understanding the problem. + +The issue is that the sse-timer-test sometimes fails on an s390x host. The error message shows that a specific assertion is failing: readl(COUNTER_BASE + CNTCV_LO) == 100, but it's getting 0 instead of 100. The test is part of QEMU's qtest suite. + +QEMU has two main modes: user-mode and system-mode. User-mode emulation runs unprivileged processes, while system-mode emulates an entire computer, including hardware devices. + +Looking at the test in question, it's a qtest which typically tests the system being emulated. The sse-timer-test probably checks the behavior of timers in the emulator. Since timers are part of the system hardware and their emulation would involve device models, this likely falls under system-mode testing. + +The fact that the assertion is about reading a specific register (CNTCV_LO) suggests it's interacting with a virtualized timer device, which is a system-level component. So any issues here would be related to how QEMU emulates these devices in system mode. + +Additionally, the failure is occurring on s390x, which is a system architecture, further indicating that this is a system-mode issue. User-mode issues usually involve process-level operations rather than hardware emulation. + +Therefore, this bug report is related to system-mode. +</think> + +system \ No newline at end of file |