diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/480')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/480 | 15 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/480 b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/480 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..12a44e02f --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/480 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to figure out whether this bug report about QEMU is related to user-mode or system-mode. The report mentions "Supported ARMv8.? Opcodes." So, it's talking about opcodes in the ARM architecture. + +First, understanding what each mode entails: User-mode deals with applications running on a CPU, handling things like instructions execution without needing high privileges. System-mode involves lower-level operations, including device management, peripherals, and operating system functions that require higher privileges. + +ARMv8 opcodes are part of the instruction set architecture, which affects how user-space programs execute. Since this is about opcodes, it relates to how the CPU processes instructions in applications, not necessarily dealing with system-level components or devices. + +So, the issue seems focused on ensuring that QEMU correctly supports these ARMv8 opcodes for application execution. That points towards a user-mode concern because it's about application-level code rather than system services or hardware interactions. + +Therefore, I classify this as 'user' related. +</think> + +The bug report focuses on ARMv8 opcode support in QEMU, which pertains to application-level instruction processing without involving higher-privilege operations. + +Answer: user \ No newline at end of file |