summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/1371
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/1371')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/13719
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/1371 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/1371
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8e30446e3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/1371
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's see. The user provided a bug report about QEMU. The problem is with the BLSMSK instruction's semantics, specifically the CF flag value differing between the actual CPU and QEMU. The steps to reproduce involve compiling some assembly code and comparing the results. The additional info mentions KAIST SoftSec found this.
+
+I need to classify this bug into one of the three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. The categories are for QEMU. 
+
+The issue is about an instruction (BLSMSK) not behaving correctly in QEMU compared to the real CPU. The CF flag is wrong. Since BLSMSK is an x86 instruction, this would fall under the 'instruction' category. The problem isn't with a syscall or runtime environment but specifically with how QEMU emulates that particular instruction. So the correct classification is 'instruction'.
+</think>
+
+instruction
\ No newline at end of file