1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/1860056 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/1860056
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f4aae15c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/1860056
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's see. The user is reporting a segmentation fault when running a MIPS binary with QEMU on a Debian host. The problem is specifically with big endian 32-bit MIPS, while 64-bit and little endian 32-bit work fine.
+
+Hmm, segmentation faults in QEMU can be tricky. The user compiled a Hello World program using mips-linux-gnu-g++ and ran it, but it segfaults. The error message mentions QEMU uncaught target signal 11. So, the question is to classify this bug into one of the categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime.
+
+First, let's think about what could cause a segfault in this context. Since the same code works for other MIPS architectures (64-bit and little endian 32-bit), the issue might be specific to the big endian 32-bit emulation in QEMU. 
+
+Instruction-related issues usually involve incorrect execution of CPU instructions. If QEMU's MIPS emulator has a bug in handling certain instructions specific to big endian mode, that could lead to a crash. For example, maybe an instruction related to memory access or endianness handling is not properly emulated.
+
+Syscall errors would involve system calls made by the program. However, the Hello World program uses cout, which involves system calls (like write), but if the problem is limited to a specific architecture, maybe the syscall handling is okay since other MIPS versions work. But why would big endian have a problem here? Maybe the syscalls are being translated or handled incorrectly in that specific case.
+
+Runtime errors could be related to dynamic linking, library issues, or environment setup. For example, maybe the C++ standard library (libstdc++) for MIPS big endian isn't properly installed or compatible. But the user is using cross-compiled tools, so perhaps the libraries are correctly set up. Also, if it's a runtime issue, maybe other programs would have similar issues, not just Hello World.
+
+But the problem is isolated to QEMU's emulation. Since the same binary works on other MIPS setups (assuming the cross-compiler produces correct code), the issue is likely in QEMU's handling of that specific architecture. 
+
+Given that it's a segfault during execution of the program, and the problem is specific to the big endian 32-bit MIPS emulation in QEMU, this could be due to incorrect instruction emulation. For example, maybe the QEMU MIPS emulator for big endian 32-bit isn't properly handling certain instructions related to memory or the C++ runtime initialization. 
+
+Alternatively, maybe there's an endianness-related bug in how QEMU handles memory or specific instructions for that configuration. Since instruction execution is fundamental to the emulator, this might fall under the 'instruction' category. 
+
+But wait, could it be a runtime issue in QEMU's dynamic translator or the way it manages the execution environment? For example, if the TCG (Tiny Code Generator) has a bug in handling certain CPU modes. However, runtime here refers to the program's runtime environment, not QEMU's internal processing. 
+
+The classification options are instruction, syscall, or runtime. Since the problem seems to be in the execution of the program's instructions (as opposed to a system call or a runtime library issue), I think the category is 'instruction'. The segmentation fault suggests that the emulator is executing an incorrect instruction or mishandling memory access, which would be an instruction-level problem.
+</think>
+
+instruction
\ No newline at end of file