diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/824')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/824 | 13 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/824 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/824 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7adfe5956 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/824 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's try to figure out the category for this bug report. The problem is about a Translation Block error in QEMU. The user provided a specific example where the generated code has some oddities. Let's break it down. + +Looking at the given instructions, there are four entries in the Translation Block. The first and third instructions are the same: "cmp eax, 0x6" with the same addresses and opcodes. The second and fourth instructions are at the same addresses, but the second is just "0f" which isn't a complete instruction, and the fourth is "jnle 0x524" which starts with "0f 8f". + +Wait, the "0f" is the prefix for two-byte opcodes. So the second byte of the fourth instruction is the actual opcode. But in the second instruction, it's only "0f", which isn't a valid instruction on its own. That suggests that the translation process might have split a multi-byte instruction incorrectly. The "jnle" is a two-byte opcode, starting with "0f" followed by "8f". So when QEMU translates the host machine code into the guest's code, it's possible that it's mishandling multi-byte instructions, leading to overlapping or incorrect translation blocks. + +The issue here seems to be with how QEMU is translating the instructions into the Translation Block. The same instruction addresses are being reused for different parts of the instruction, which shouldn't happen. This could be a problem in the dynamic translation process, where the translator isn't properly accounting for multi-byte opcodes or is misaligning the instructions. + +Since the problem is related to the translation of instructions into the block and the structure of those instructions, it's not a syscall issue. It's not a runtime error either because the error is in the translation process itself, which is part of the instruction decoding and translation. Therefore, the category should be "instruction". +</think> + +instruction \ No newline at end of file |