diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/1726394')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/1726394 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/1726394 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/1726394 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2be8ebbc6 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/1726394 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's see. The user is talking about a bug in QEMU where prctl with PR_SET_SECCOMP and SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER is being passed through unmodified. The third argument is an address to a BPF filter, but it's causing an EFAULT. The problem is that the filter is architecture-specific, so QEMU can't rewrite the addresses. The suggestion is to return an error, maybe EINVAL, but they want something that indicates seccomp isn't supported so those errors can be ignored. + +So, the question is to classify this bug report into one of the three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. + +First, I need to recall what each category means. + +Instruction-related bugs are about faulty instructions, like if there's an incorrect CPU instruction being executed or emulated. + +Syscall would be issues related to system calls, like incorrect handling of a system call by QEMU. + +Runtime errors are other errors that occur during the execution of the program that don't fit into the other two categories. + +In this case, the problem is with the prctl system call. QEMU is passing through the prctl call without modifying the arguments, but the third argument (address) is architecture-specific. Since the BPF filter is architecture-specific, QEMU can't handle it and returns an error. This is about how the system call is being handled. The user is saying that the issue arises because QEMU isn't adjusting the syscall's arguments properly, leading to an EFAULT. Therefore, this seems to be a problem with the syscall handling in QEMU. The error occurs because the syscall is being processed incorrectly, so the category would be 'syscall'. + +Wait, but maybe the error is happening at runtime because it's about how QEMU is processing the arguments during execution. However, the classification is about what kind of error it is. Since the root cause is in the handling of a specific system call (prctl) and the arguments passed to it, I think it's a syscall issue. The problem is that QEMU isn't correctly emulating the syscall for the given architecture. So the error is in the syscall handling. Therefore, the correct category is 'syscall'. +</think> + +syscall \ No newline at end of file |