1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/2101 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/2101
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d4b03e98a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/2101
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's see. The user is trying to run an x86_64 binary (ls) on an aarch64 platform using QEMU. They mentioned that when they use qemu-x86_64 with the -L option pointing to a directory containing the necessary libraries, the command ls / gives wrong results.
+
+First, I need to understand what the -L option does. From what I remember, the -L option in QEMU specifies the directory that contains the system root for the emulation. So when you run qemu-x86_64 -L /path/to/root /bin/ls, it tells QEMU to use /path/to/root as the root directory for the emulated x86_64 environment. This means that when the program tries to access the root directory, it's actually accessing this specified path on the host system.
+
+Now, the problem is that when the user runs the command, the output is incorrect. Possible reasons could be:
+
+1. **Library Issues**: The copied libraries might not be compatible or are missing some files. If the dynamic linker (ld-linux-x86-64.so.2) isn't present or is incorrect, the program might not run properly. But the user mentioned they copied all the dependencies using the script, so maybe that's not the issue.
+
+2. **Syscall Handling**: QEMU emulates syscalls, but there might be a discrepancy in how certain syscalls are handled between the host (aarch64) and the emulated x86_64 environment. For example, if the ls command is trying to read directory entries and the syscall returns different structures or data, it could lead to incorrect output.
+
+3. **Path Resolution**: The -L option mounts the specified directory as the root. If the path resolution is incorrect, when ls tries to list /, it might be pointing to the wrong directory. For example, if the -L path is not correctly set up, the root directory in the emulated environment might not match what the user expects. However, the user's command seems to explicitly set the -L path, so this could be a configuration error, but the problem persists even when following the steps.
+
+4. **Emulation Bugs**: There could be a bug in QEMU's user-mode emulation for x86_64 on aarch64. Maybe certain system calls or behaviors are not correctly emulated, leading to incorrect results when accessing the file system.
+
+The user provided a script that copies the necessary files and runs QEMU. The problem occurs when they run the ls command with -l /, leading to wrong results. The key here is that it's a runtime issue. If it's a syscall problem, then the emulation of syscalls might not be correctly translating the x86_64 syscalls into the equivalent aarch64 syscalls. For example, if the opendir or readdir syscalls are not handled correctly, the ls command might not display the correct directory contents.
+
+Alternatively, if the dynamic linker is not correctly loaded or the environment is not set up properly, it might lead to runtime errors. But the user mentioned they copied all dependencies, so that's less likely.
+
+Since the problem happens during the execution of the program under QEMU, and the issue is related to the system call handling when accessing the file system, this would fall under the 'syscall' category. The wrong result when listing the root directory suggests that the syscalls related to directory operations are not being correctly emulated or translated between the architectures.
+</think>
+
+syscall
\ No newline at end of file