summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/276
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/276')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/2769
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/276 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/276
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..340469ed0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/276
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's see. The user mentioned an error in the user-mode calculation of an ELF program's brk in QEMU. The categories are instruction, syscall, or runtime.
+
+First, I need to understand what "brk" refers to. The brk system call is used in Unix-like systems to adjust the amount of memory allocated for the program's data segment. So when a program uses brk, it's making a system call to change the break value.
+
+The error here is about the calculation in user-mode. QEMU emulates the system calls, right? So if there's a mistake in how QEMU handles the brk syscall when running in user-mode, that would fall under syscall. The problem isn't with the instruction itself (like a wrong CPU instruction being executed), nor is it a general runtime error. It's specifically about the syscall handling for brk. So the correct category should be syscall.
+</think>
+
+syscall
\ No newline at end of file