diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic')
7 files changed, 551 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/12360755 b/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/12360755 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3e04cfd8d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/12360755 @@ -0,0 +1,304 @@ +semantic: 0.911 +device: 0.902 +graphic: 0.899 +instruction: 0.894 +assembly: 0.893 +other: 0.886 +mistranslation: 0.844 +boot: 0.818 +vnc: 0.810 +socket: 0.805 +KVM: 0.770 +network: 0.738 + +[Qemu-devel] [BUG] virtio-net linux driver fails to probe on MIPS Malta since 'hw/virtio-pci: fix virtio behaviour' + +Hi, + +I've bisected the following failure of the virtio_net linux v4.10 driver +to probe in QEMU v2.9.0-rc1 emulating a MIPS Malta machine: + +virtio_net virtio0: virtio: device uses modern interface but does not have +VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 +virtio_net: probe of virtio0 failed with error -22 + +To QEMU commit 9a4c0e220d8a ("hw/virtio-pci: fix virtio behaviour"). + +It appears that adding ",disable-modern=on,disable-legacy=off" to the +virtio-net -device makes it work again. + +I presume this should really just work out of the box. Any ideas why it +isn't? + +Cheers +James +signature.asc +Description: +Digital signature + +On 03/17/2017 11:57 PM, James Hogan wrote: +Hi, + +I've bisected the following failure of the virtio_net linux v4.10 driver +to probe in QEMU v2.9.0-rc1 emulating a MIPS Malta machine: + +virtio_net virtio0: virtio: device uses modern interface but does not have +VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 +virtio_net: probe of virtio0 failed with error -22 + +To QEMU commit 9a4c0e220d8a ("hw/virtio-pci: fix virtio behaviour"). + +It appears that adding ",disable-modern=on,disable-legacy=off" to the +virtio-net -device makes it work again. + +I presume this should really just work out of the box. Any ideas why it +isn't? +Hi, + + +This is strange. This commit changes virtio devices from legacy to virtio +"transitional". +(your command line changes it to legacy) +Linux 4.10 supports virtio modern/transitional (as far as I know) and on QEMU +side +there is nothing new. + +Michael, do you have any idea? + +Thanks, +Marcel +Cheers +James + +On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:21:22PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: +> +On 03/17/2017 11:57 PM, James Hogan wrote: +> +> Hi, +> +> +> +> I've bisected the following failure of the virtio_net linux v4.10 driver +> +> to probe in QEMU v2.9.0-rc1 emulating a MIPS Malta machine: +> +> +> +> virtio_net virtio0: virtio: device uses modern interface but does not have +> +> VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 +> +> virtio_net: probe of virtio0 failed with error -22 +> +> +> +> To QEMU commit 9a4c0e220d8a ("hw/virtio-pci: fix virtio behaviour"). +> +> +> +> It appears that adding ",disable-modern=on,disable-legacy=off" to the +> +> virtio-net -device makes it work again. +> +> +> +> I presume this should really just work out of the box. Any ideas why it +> +> isn't? +> +> +> +> +Hi, +> +> +> +This is strange. This commit changes virtio devices from legacy to virtio +> +"transitional". +> +(your command line changes it to legacy) +> +Linux 4.10 supports virtio modern/transitional (as far as I know) and on QEMU +> +side +> +there is nothing new. +> +> +Michael, do you have any idea? +> +> +Thanks, +> +Marcel +My guess would be firmware mishandling 64 bit BARs - we saw such +a case on sparc previously. As a result you are probably reading +all zeroes from features register or something like that. +Marcel, could you send a patch making the bar 32 bit? +If that helps we know what the issue is. + +> +> Cheers +> +> James +> +> + +On 03/20/2017 05:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: +On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:21:22PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: +On 03/17/2017 11:57 PM, James Hogan wrote: +Hi, + +I've bisected the following failure of the virtio_net linux v4.10 driver +to probe in QEMU v2.9.0-rc1 emulating a MIPS Malta machine: + +virtio_net virtio0: virtio: device uses modern interface but does not have +VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 +virtio_net: probe of virtio0 failed with error -22 + +To QEMU commit 9a4c0e220d8a ("hw/virtio-pci: fix virtio behaviour"). + +It appears that adding ",disable-modern=on,disable-legacy=off" to the +virtio-net -device makes it work again. + +I presume this should really just work out of the box. Any ideas why it +isn't? +Hi, + + +This is strange. This commit changes virtio devices from legacy to virtio +"transitional". +(your command line changes it to legacy) +Linux 4.10 supports virtio modern/transitional (as far as I know) and on QEMU +side +there is nothing new. + +Michael, do you have any idea? + +Thanks, +Marcel +My guess would be firmware mishandling 64 bit BARs - we saw such +a case on sparc previously. As a result you are probably reading +all zeroes from features register or something like that. +Marcel, could you send a patch making the bar 32 bit? +If that helps we know what the issue is. +Sure, + +Thanks, +Marcel +Cheers +James + +On 03/20/2017 05:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: +On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:21:22PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: +On 03/17/2017 11:57 PM, James Hogan wrote: +Hi, + +I've bisected the following failure of the virtio_net linux v4.10 driver +to probe in QEMU v2.9.0-rc1 emulating a MIPS Malta machine: + +virtio_net virtio0: virtio: device uses modern interface but does not have +VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 +virtio_net: probe of virtio0 failed with error -22 + +To QEMU commit 9a4c0e220d8a ("hw/virtio-pci: fix virtio behaviour"). + +It appears that adding ",disable-modern=on,disable-legacy=off" to the +virtio-net -device makes it work again. + +I presume this should really just work out of the box. Any ideas why it +isn't? +Hi, + + +This is strange. This commit changes virtio devices from legacy to virtio +"transitional". +(your command line changes it to legacy) +Linux 4.10 supports virtio modern/transitional (as far as I know) and on QEMU +side +there is nothing new. + +Michael, do you have any idea? + +Thanks, +Marcel +My guess would be firmware mishandling 64 bit BARs - we saw such +a case on sparc previously. As a result you are probably reading +all zeroes from features register or something like that. +Marcel, could you send a patch making the bar 32 bit? +If that helps we know what the issue is. +Hi James, + +Can you please check if the below patch fixes the problem? +Please note it is not a solution. + +diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c +index f9b7244..5b4d429 100644 +--- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c ++++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c +@@ -1671,9 +1671,7 @@ static void virtio_pci_device_plugged(DeviceState *d, +Error **errp) + } + + pci_register_bar(&proxy->pci_dev, proxy->modern_mem_bar_idx, +- PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY | +- PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH | +- PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64, ++ PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY, + &proxy->modern_bar); + + proxy->config_cap = virtio_pci_add_mem_cap(proxy, &cfg.cap); + + +Thanks, +Marcel + +Hi Marcel, + +On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 04:16:58PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: +> +Can you please check if the below patch fixes the problem? +> +Please note it is not a solution. +> +> +diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c +> +index f9b7244..5b4d429 100644 +> +--- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c +> ++++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c +> +@@ -1671,9 +1671,7 @@ static void virtio_pci_device_plugged(DeviceState *d, +> +Error **errp) +> +} +> +> +pci_register_bar(&proxy->pci_dev, proxy->modern_mem_bar_idx, +> +- PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY | +> +- PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH | +> +- PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64, +> ++ PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY, +> +&proxy->modern_bar); +> +> +proxy->config_cap = virtio_pci_add_mem_cap(proxy, &cfg.cap); +Sorry for the delay trying this, I was away last week. + +No, it doesn't seem to make any difference. + +Thanks +James +signature.asc +Description: +Digital signature + diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/gitlab_semantic_addsubps b/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/gitlab_semantic_addsubps new file mode 100644 index 000000000..11861d18a --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/gitlab_semantic_addsubps @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +semantic: 0.974 +instruction: 0.931 +device: 0.758 +other: 0.732 +graphic: 0.700 +vnc: 0.544 +assembly: 0.531 +boot: 0.465 +socket: 0.426 +network: 0.393 +mistranslation: 0.299 +KVM: 0.192 + +x86 SSE/SSE2/SSE3 instruction semantic bugs with NaN + +Description of problem +The result of SSE/SSE2/SSE3 instructions with NaN is different from the CPU. From Intel manual Volume 1 Appendix D.4.2.2, they defined the behavior of such instructions with NaN. But I think QEMU did not implement this semantic exactly because the byte result is different. + +Steps to reproduce + +Compile this code + +void main() { + asm("mov rax, 0x000000007fffffff; push rax; mov rax, 0x00000000ffffffff; push rax; movdqu XMM1, [rsp];"); + asm("mov rax, 0x2e711de7aa46af1a; push rax; mov rax, 0x7fffffff7fffffff; push rax; movdqu XMM2, [rsp];"); + asm("addsubps xmm1, xmm2"); +} + +Execute and compare the result with the CPU. This problem happens with other SSE/SSE2/SSE3 instructions specified in the manual, Volume 1 Appendix D.4.2.2. + +CPU xmm1[3] = 0xffffffff + +QEMU xmm1[3] = 0x7fffffff + +Additional information +This bug is discovered by research conducted by KAIST SoftSec. diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/gitlab_semantic_adox b/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/gitlab_semantic_adox new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ed838cbdd --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/gitlab_semantic_adox @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +semantic: 0.990 +instruction: 0.944 +assembly: 0.913 +graphic: 0.782 +device: 0.776 +vnc: 0.663 +boot: 0.599 +socket: 0.556 +mistranslation: 0.452 +network: 0.426 +other: 0.286 +KVM: 0.240 + +x86 ADOX and ADCX semantic bug +Description of problem +The result of instruction ADOX and ADCX are different from the CPU. The value of one of EFLAGS is different. + +Steps to reproduce + +Compile this code + + +void main() { + asm("push 512; popfq;"); + asm("mov rax, 0xffffffff84fdbf24"); + asm("mov rbx, 0xb197d26043bec15d"); + asm("adox eax, ebx"); +} + + + +Execute and compare the result with the CPU. This problem happens with ADCX, too (with CF). + +CPU + +OF = 0 + + +QEMU + +OF = 1 + + + + + + +Additional information +This bug is discovered by research conducted by KAIST SoftSec. diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/gitlab_semantic_bextr b/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/gitlab_semantic_bextr new file mode 100644 index 000000000..04138b620 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/gitlab_semantic_bextr @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +semantic: 0.993 +instruction: 0.944 +assembly: 0.800 +graphic: 0.790 +device: 0.717 +boot: 0.516 +vnc: 0.471 +socket: 0.397 +mistranslation: 0.337 +network: 0.219 +other: 0.099 +KVM: 0.091 + +x86 BEXTR semantic bug +Description of problem +The result of instruction BEXTR is different with from the CPU. The value of destination register is different. I think QEMU does not consider the operand size limit. + +Steps to reproduce + +Compile this code + +void main() { + asm("mov rax, 0x17b3693f77fb6e9"); + asm("mov rbx, 0x8f635a775ad3b9b4"); + asm("mov rcx, 0xb717b75da9983018"); + asm("bextr eax, ebx, ecx"); +} + +Execute and compare the result with the CPU. + +CPU +RAX = 0x5a + +QEMU +RAX = 0x635a775a + +Additional information +This bug is discovered by research conducted by KAIST SoftSec. diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/gitlab_semantic_blsi b/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/gitlab_semantic_blsi new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d8fbffa2f --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/gitlab_semantic_blsi @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +semantic: 0.983 +instruction: 0.964 +graphic: 0.873 +assembly: 0.852 +device: 0.790 +socket: 0.764 +vnc: 0.756 +boot: 0.678 +network: 0.672 +other: 0.609 +mistranslation: 0.606 +KVM: 0.412 + +x86 BLSI and BLSR semantic bug +Description of problem +The result of instruction BLSI and BLSR is different from the CPU. The value of CF is different. + +Steps to reproduce + +Compile this code + + +void main() { + asm("blsi rax, rbx"); +} + + + +Execute and compare the result with the CPU. The value of CF is exactly the opposite. This problem happens with BLSR, too. + + +Additional information +This bug is discovered by research conducted by KAIST SoftSec. diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/gitlab_semantic_blsmsk b/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/gitlab_semantic_blsmsk new file mode 100644 index 000000000..97ed28934 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/gitlab_semantic_blsmsk @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +semantic: 0.987 +instruction: 0.962 +assembly: 0.879 +device: 0.743 +graphic: 0.735 +vnc: 0.612 +socket: 0.607 +mistranslation: 0.603 +boot: 0.585 +network: 0.366 +other: 0.269 +KVM: 0.163 + +x86 BLSMSK semantic bug +Description of problem +The result of instruction BLSMSK is different with from the CPU. The value of CF is different. + +Steps to reproduce + +Compile this code + +void main() { + asm("mov rax, 0x65b2e276ad27c67"); + asm("mov rbx, 0x62f34955226b2b5d"); + asm("blsmsk eax, ebx"); +} + +Execute and compare the result with the CPU. + +CPU + +CF = 0 + + +QEMU + +CF = 1 + +Additional information +This bug is discovered by research conducted by KAIST SoftSec. diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/gitlab_semantic_bzhi b/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/gitlab_semantic_bzhi new file mode 100644 index 000000000..476461d96 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot/005/semantic/gitlab_semantic_bzhi @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +semantic: 0.920 +graphic: 0.652 +instruction: 0.623 +device: 0.589 +assembly: 0.406 +vnc: 0.287 +boot: 0.220 +network: 0.203 +socket: 0.198 +mistranslation: 0.171 +other: 0.064 +KVM: 0.064 + +x86 BZHI semantic bug +Description of problem +The result of instruction BZHI is different from the CPU. The value of destination register and SF of EFLAGS are different. + +Steps to reproduce + +Compile this code + + +void main() { + asm("mov rax, 0xb1aa9da2fe33fe3"); + asm("mov rbx, 0x80000000ffffffff"); + asm("mov rcx, 0xf3fce8829b99a5c6"); + asm("bzhi rax, rbx, rcx"); +} + + + +Execute and compare the result with the CPU. + +CPU + +RAX = 0x0x80000000ffffffff +SF = 1 + + +QEMU + +RAX = 0xffffffff +SF = 0 + + + + + + +Additional information +This bug is discovered by research conducted by KAIST SoftSec. |