1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
|
<think>
Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The problem is that Go's garbage collector crashes when using qemu-x86_64 on an aarch64 host. Let me go through each possible category to see which fits best.
Looking at the options: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
The issue is happening when running a x86_64 binary on an aarch64 system using QEMU. The problem seems to be with the Go garbage collector crashing, which is a runtime issue related to how memory or processes are handled in the emulated environment.
From the bug report, the crash occurs during garbage collection, specifically in lfstack.push. This suggests it's related to memory management. Since QEMU is involved, especially when using binfmt_misc to interpret x86_64 binaries on an aarch64 host, this likely pertains to how QEMU handles certain system calls or memory mappings.
The user mentioned that bisecting points to commits in QEMU's linux-user code, specifically changes related to do_munmap and mmap placement. These are kernel-related functions within QEMU's user-mode emulation layer. So the issue is with how QEMU emulates these system calls on aarch64 when running x86_64 binaries.
Considering that, it's not about translation or assembly lowering directly but more about how QEMU handles certain OS-level operations. It also doesn't seem to be a device, graphic, network, etc., issue. The kernel and hypervisor categories are closer because they relate to system-level emulation.
But wait, the problem is within the user-mode part of QEMU, which emulates system calls for the guest OS. This would fall under the 'kernel' category since it's about how the user-space part (linux-user) handles certain operations that mimic the host kernel functions.
Alternatively, since it's related to memory management and process emulation, perhaps 'other' could be a possibility if it doesn't fit into more specific categories. But given that it's tied to changes in QEMU's linux-user code, which is part of the hypervisor layer providing system calls to the guest, I think 'hypervisor' might be more accurate.
Wait, but looking back, the issue arises when Go runs under QEMU and crashes due to GC issues. The problem isn't with the hypervisor itself but with how user-mode processes are handled in emulation. Therefore, it's more about the kernel part of QEMU that emulates the Linux system calls for the guest.
So, 'kernel' seems appropriate as it relates to the system call handling within the user-mode emulation, which is part of the QEMU's kernel simulation for the guest OS.
</think>
The issue is related to how QEMU's user-mode emulation handles certain memory management functions when running a x86_64 binary on an aarch64 host. The problem arises from changes in the linux-user code that affect mmap and munmap operations, leading to a crash in Go's garbage collector.
**Classification:** kernel
|