1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
|
<think>
Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let's see what the issue is.
The user reported that when using `-rtc base=utc,clock=vm`, the guest's RTC time runs slower than the host by about 3 seconds. They noticed this without NTP service enabled, as NTP usually corrects such discrepancies.
Looking at the problem details, it seems to involve the RTC (Real-Time Clock) settings in QEMU. The RTC is part of the hardware emulation provided by QEMU, specifically related to how time is managed in the virtual machine.
The possible categories include 'clock' which I think would be appropriate here since the issue relates to timekeeping mechanisms. However, looking at the options provided earlier: performance, kernel, hypervisor, etc., but 'clock' isn't listed. Wait, the user has specific categories like 'performance', 'hypervisor', etc.
Wait, let me check again. The categories are:
- mistranslation
- assembly
- other
- device
- graphic
- socket
- network
- KVM
- boot
- vnc
- debug
- files
- permissions
- performance
- kernel
- peripherals
- hypervisor
So, 'RTC' is part of the hardware devices. The problem is with how QEMU handles the RTC time synchronization when using `clock=vm`. This seems related to device emulation, specifically the RTC device.
Therefore, I think the correct category would be 'device'.
</think>
The bug report deals with an issue in the RTC (Real-Time Clock) functionality of QEMU. Since RTC is a hardware device emulated by QEMU, and the problem arises from how the clock is handled, it falls under the 'device' category.
**Answer:**
device
|