1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
|
<think>
Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU lacking support for PID namespaces. Let's see what the categories are again: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
PID namespaces are a feature in Linux that allows processes to have isolated process IDs. They're typically used for containerization and process isolation. Now, QEMU is a machine emulator and virtualizer, so it deals with emulating hardware, including things like device emulation, network interfaces, etc.
The issue here is about missing support for PID namespaces. Since PID namespaces are part of the OS's kernel features, specifically related to process management and isolation, I'm thinking this might fall under the 'kernel' category. Alternatively, since it's about namespaces which can affect containerization, maybe 'other' as well, but looking at the categories, 'kernel' seems more precise.
Wait, but sometimes hypervisor could be a consideration because QEMU acts as a hypervisor when using KVM. However, PID namespace support is more of an OS-level feature rather than something handled by the hypervisor itself. So I think it's better to categorize this under 'kernel'.
Another thought: does QEMU need to handle namespaces for the guest OS? If the bug report is about the host OS not supporting PID namespaces when running QEMU, maybe that's a different category, but in this context, it's more likely about the guest's namespace handling.
I'm leaning towards 'kernel' because it relates to process management features provided by the operating system kernel. So I'll go with 'kernel'.
</think>
kernel
|