summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/2520
blob: 595eca0294a92cefe7479c3f0fc924fa9d53650c (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
<think>
Alright, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the problem description carefully.

The user is experiencing an issue where the QEMU display becomes blank with a message saying "Display output is not active" after waking up from suspend mode. They followed specific steps: generated an image, ran QEMU, suspended using S3 state, and then used socat to wake up. The system resumes but no display.

Looking at the categories provided, I see options like 'display', 'graphic', and others. Since the problem is related to the display output after resume, it's likely a graphics issue. The message specifically mentions display output not being active, pointing towards a problem in how QEMU handles the graphical interface post-suspend.

I don't think it's about device drivers or peripherals because the issue occurs with both a custom image and Ubuntu, suggesting it's more systemic. It's also not related to network, socket, or hypervisor issues as the display is purely graphical.

Therefore, the appropriate category here should be 'display' since it directly relates to the graphical output of QEMU.
</think>

The bug report describes an issue where the QEMU display becomes blank after waking up from suspend mode. The message "Display output is not active" suggests that there's a problem with how QEMU handles the graphical interface when resuming from suspend.

Given this, the most appropriate category for this bug would be **display** because it directly relates to the graphical output and the display functionality in QEMU.

```plaintext
display
```