blob: efaf82ca9afd58e1d2648a6271c7a9addf3aacaa (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
|
<think>
Okay, I'm trying to classify this bug report about QEMU. The title says "VTCR fields are not checked when building parameters for aarch64 secure EL2 page table walk."
First, I need to understand what each part means. VTCR is related to the MMU (Memory Management Unit) in ARM architecture, specifically for virtualization. Secure EL2 refers to the secure hypervisor mode. The bug report mentions that when building parameters for a page table walk under these conditions, the VTCR fields aren't being checked.
Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation is about incorrect mapping from source to target, which seems related here since it's about MMU handling. Other options like device or network don't fit. Page tables are part of memory management, so maybe 'mistranslation' applies because if VTCR fields aren't checked properly, the translation might be incorrect.
Wait, but another thought: page table walks involve translating virtual addresses to physical ones, and missing checks on VTCR could lead to incorrect mappings. This sounds like a semantic issue in the translation process, so 'mistranslation' makes sense. Alternatively, is it more about assembly lowering or parameters handling? But the main issue is that certain fields aren't being checked during parameter building for page tables.
Yes, since this affects address translation and could lead to incorrect memory accesses, it's likely under 'mistranslation'. So I think the category should be mistranslation.
</think>
The bug involves an issue with virtualization-related MMU fields not being properly validated during a page table walk in secure EL2 mode. This relates to incorrect handling of address translation parameters, which falls under semantic mapping errors.
**Answer:**
mistranslation
|