summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/network/614958
blob: 2be7c79a0c4e54de1feed94105e0a6fc82b51b90 (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
<think>
Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The user is talking about implementing copy-paste between VMs directly in QEMU. They mentioned that currently, users have to set up things like VNC or TCP-based solutions, which can be tricky and require extra software. They believe this lack of a built-in solution is causing frustration and making many users switch to other products like VirtualBox.

Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and 'other'. 

The main issue here is about copy-paste functionality between a client VM and the host. This typically involves handling clipboard data which usually goes through some form of inter-process communication or network-based solutions. Since the user mentioned VNC and other networking-based approaches as current workarounds, it points towards something related to how QEMU handles input/output or perhaps graphical interactions.

But wait, copy-paste isn't directly about graphics rendering but more about data transfer between two systems. However, in a VM context, this often relies on the hypervisor's ability to manage such interactions, possibly through network interfaces or shared memory. Since implementing this natively in QEMU would likely involve enhancing its inter-VM communication channels, it might fall under 'network' because even if it's direct, it could be facilitated over a network interface or similar mechanisms.

Alternatively, it could also relate to the graphical interface since copy-paste is a GUI feature. But I think the broader category here is that it's about enabling data transfer between host and guest, which often uses network-based solutions in QEMU. Therefore, 'network' seems like the most appropriate category.
</think>

network